Videnskab
 science >> Videnskab >  >> Astronomi

Asteroiden, der dannede Vredefort-krateret, var større end tidligere antaget

En impactor - højst sandsynligt en asteroide - styrtede mod Jorden for omkring to milliarder år siden og styrtede ind i planeten nær det nuværende Johannesburg, Sydafrika. Impaktoren dannede Vredefort-krateret, hvad der i dag er det største krater på vores planet. Ved hjælp af opdaterede simuleringsdata opdagede forskere fra University of Rochester, at slaglegemet, der dannede Vredefort-krateret, var meget større end tidligere antaget. Kredit:NASA Earth Observatory billede af Lauren Dauphin / University of Rochester illustration af Julia Joshpe

For omkring 2 milliarder år siden styrtede en stødlegeme mod Jorden og styrtede ind i planeten i et område nær det nuværende Johannesburg, Sydafrika. Impaktoren - højst sandsynligt en asteroide - dannede det, der i dag er det største krater på vores planet. Forskere har bredt accepteret, baseret på tidligere forskning, at stødstrukturen, kendt som Vredefort-krateret, blev dannet af et objekt på omkring 15 kilometer (ca. 9,3 miles) i diameter, der rejste med en hastighed på 15 kilometer i sekundet.

Men ifølge ny forskning fra University of Rochester, kan impactoren have været meget større - og ville have haft ødelæggende konsekvenser over hele planeten. Denne forskning, offentliggjort i Journal of Geophysical Research:Planets , giver en mere præcis forståelse af den store påvirkning og vil give forskere mulighed for bedre at simulere påvirkningsbegivenheder på Jorden og andre planeter, både i fortiden og fremtiden.

"Det er afgørende at forstå den største påvirkningsstruktur, vi har på Jorden," siger Natalie Allen, nu ph.d. studerende ved John Hopkins University. Allen er den første forfatter af papiret, baseret på forskning, hun udførte som bachelorstuderende ved Rochester med Miki Nakajima, en assisterende professor i jord- og miljøvidenskab. "At have adgang til informationen fra en struktur som Vredefort-krateret er en fantastisk mulighed for at teste vores model og vores forståelse af de geologiske beviser, så vi bedre kan forstå påvirkninger på Jorden og videre."

Opdaterede simuleringer tyder på "ødelæggende" konsekvenser

I løbet af 2 milliarder år er Vredefort-krateret eroderet. Dette gør det vanskeligt for forskere direkte at estimere størrelsen af ​​krateret på tidspunktet for det oprindelige nedslag, og derfor størrelsen og hastigheden af ​​stødlegemet, der dannede krateret.

Et objekt, der er 15 kilometer i størrelse og bevæger sig med en hastighed på 15 kilometer i sekundet, ville producere et krater på omkring 172 kilometer i diameter. Dette er dog meget mindre end de nuværende skøn for Vredefort-krateret. Disse nuværende estimater er baseret på nye geologiske beviser og målinger, der estimerer, at strukturens oprindelige diameter ville have været mellem 250 og 280 kilometer (ca. 155 og 174 miles) i løbet af nedslaget.

Allen, Nakajima og deres kolleger udførte simuleringer for at matche den opdaterede størrelse af krateret. Their results showed that an impactor would have to be much larger—about 20 to 25 kilometers—and traveling at a velocity of 15 to 20 kilometers per second to explain a crater 250 kilometers in size.

This means the impactor that formed the Vredefort crater would have been larger than the asteroid that killed off the dinosaurs 66 million years ago, forming the Chicxulub crater. That impact had damaging effects globally, including greenhouse heating, widespread forest fires, acid rain, and destruction of the ozone layer, in addition to causing the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event that killed the dinosaurs.

If the Vredefort crater was even larger and the impact more energetic than that which formed the Chicxulub crater, the Vredefort impact may have caused even more catastrophic global consequences.

"Unlike the Chicxulub impact, the Vredefort impact did not leave a record of mass extinction or forest fires, given that there were only single-cell lifeforms and no trees existed 2 billion years ago," Nakajima says. "However, the impact would have affected the global climate potentially more extensively than the Chicxulub impact did."

Dust and aerosols from the Vredefort impact would have spread across the planet and blocked sunlight, cooling the Earth's surface, she says. "This could have had a devastating effect on photosynthetic organisms. After the dust and aerosols settled—which could have taken anywhere from hours to a decade—greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide that were emitted from the impact would have raised the global temperature potentially by several degrees for a long period of time."

A multi-faceted model of Vredefort crater

The simulations also allowed the researchers to study the material ejected by the impact and the distance the material traveled from the crater. They can use this information to determine the geographic locations of land masses billions of years ago. For instance, previous research determined material from the impactor was ejected to present-day Karelia, Russia. Using their model, Allen, Nakajima, and their colleagues found that 2 billion years ago, the distance of the land mass containing Karelia would have been only 2,000 to 2,500 kilometers from the crater in South Africa—much closer than the two areas are today.

"It is incredibly difficult to constrain the location of landmasses long ago," Allen says. "The current best simulations have mapped back about a billion years, and uncertainties grow larger the further back you go. Clarifying evidence such as this ejecta layer mapping may allow researchers to test their models and help complete the view into the past."

Undergraduate research leads to publication

The idea for this paper arose as part of a final for the course Planetary Interiors (now named Physics of Planetary Interiors), taught by Nakajima, which Allen took as a junior.

Allen says the experience of having undergraduate work result in a peer-reviewed journal article was very rewarding and helped her when applying for graduate school.

"When Professor Nakajima approached me and asked if I wanted to work together to turn it into a publishable work, it was really gratifying and validating," Allen says. "I had formulated my own research idea, and it was seen as compelling enough to another scientist that they thought it was worth publishing."

She adds, "This project was way outside of my usual research comfort zone, but I thought it would be a great learning experience and would force me to apply my skills in a new way. It gave me a lot of confidence in my research abilities as I prepared to go to graduate school." + Udforsk yderligere

More than one asteroid could have spelled doom for the dinosaurs




Varme artikler